One Australian company has prevented personnel from utilizing the technology, others are scrambling for guidance on its cybersecurity implications - while federal government ministers are urging caution.
But others have invited DeepSeek's arrival, calling for Australia to follow China's lead in developing powerful yet less energy-intensive AI technology.
In the days considering that the Chinese company released its R1 artificial intelligence model and openly released its chatbot and app, it has overthrown the AI market.
- Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news e-mail
Several global industry leaders saw their market worths drop after the launch, wiki.myamens.com as DeepSeek revealed AI could be developed using a portion of the cost and processing needed to train models such as ChatGPT or Meta's Llama.
Its arrival may indicate a new market shift, however for federal government and organization, the impact is uncertain. Whereas ChatGPT's 2022 arrival caught federal and services by surprise as personnel began to try the brand-new AI innovation, ghetto-art-asso.com a minimum of for the arrival of Deepseek, some had a playbook.
Business as usual
A spokesperson for Telstra stated the business had "an extensive procedure to examine all AI tools, capabilities, and use cases in our business", including a list of approved generative AI tools, and guidelines on how to use them.
For engel-und-waisen.de now at Telstra, DeepSeek is not approved and classihub.in its use is not motivated (although it's not officially obstructed).
"Our preferred partner is MS Copilot, and we're rolling out 21,000 Copilot for Microsoft 365 licences to our employees."
Other companies looked for immediate recommendations on whether DeepSeek need to be embraced.
Major Australian cybersecurity company CyberCX's executive director of cyber intelligence, Katherine Mansted, stated customers had already approached the business for guidance on whether the technology was safe.
"That's no surprise, because it seems the entire world has actually remained in a bit of a DeepSeek frenzy - both the financially and market likely and those with the security lens," Mansted said.
DeepSeek and government
CyberCX this week took the unusual action of rapidly issuing recommendations suggesting organisations, consisting of government departments and those storing sensitive info, highly consider restricting access to DeepSeek on work devices.
"We understand that there is no proactive policy here from federal government ... We've been down this roadway previously," Mansted said. "We've had arguments about TikTok, about Chinese security cameras, about Huawei in the telco network, and we constantly act after the fact, not before the truth ... Here, especially since the threats are around compromise of delicate details, in regards to any information that you take into this AI assistant: it's going straight to China.
"We believed we needed to act quicker this time."
Under federal AI policy implemented in September 2024, firms have till the end of February 2025 to publish transparency documents about their use of AI.
But understanding who makes decisions on the specific usage of DeepSeek in the federal government has shown challenging. The attorney general's department, which made the choice to prohibit TikTok utilize on government devices, referred questions to the Digital Transformation Agency, which in turn referred enquires to the Department of Home Affairs.
Home Affairs was asked on Thursday for its main policy and did not provide an action by the time of publication.
Familiar debates ...
Some of the reaction in Australia to DeepSeek is by now familiar. There have been calls to ban the innovation, in the middle of concern over how the Chinese government may access user data - an echo of the days Huawei was prohibited from the NBN and 5G rollouts in Australia, and more recently, of the debate over prohibiting TikTok.
The Australian Strategic Policy Institute, a strong critic of the China federal government, stated today that Australia "can not continue the existing technique of reacting to each brand-new tech development". It called for a tech method covering AI that included investing in sovereign AI capabilities.
The market minister, Ed Husic, stated on Tuesday it was too early to decide on whether DeepSeek was a security threat.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
"If there is anything that provides a threat in the nationwide interest, we will constantly keep an open mind and watch what takes place. I think it's prematurely to jump to conclusions on that," he said. "But, again, if we need to act, then responsible governments do."
He worried that Australia is "in the final phases" of planning its action and would establish its own regulatory settings.
"The US is flagging their method. The EU has theirs. Canada likewise will have a different method. And our local partners as well are looking at this," he said.
3
As DeepSeek Upends the aI Industry, one Group is Urging Australia to Embrace The Opportunity
Barry Gossett edited this page 5 months ago